Skip to main content

Full text of "A note on some observations of dye in coastal waters"

See other formats


Columbia  University  in  the  City  of  New  York 

LAMONT  GEOLOGICAL  OBSERVATORY 
PALISADES,  NEW  YORK 


A  NOTE  ON  SOME  OBSERVATIONS 
OF  DYE  IN  COASTAL  WATERS 


Report  prepared  by:  R.  Gerard 

and 

B.  Katz 


Technical  Report  No,  CU-3-63  to  the  Atomic  Energy  Commission 

Contract  AT(30~1)2663 


July,  1963 


A  NOTE  ON  SOME  OBSERVATIONS 
OF  DYE  IN  COASTAL  WATERS 


Report  prepared  by:  R.  Gerard 

and 

B.  Katz 


Technical  Report  No,  CU-3-63  to  the  Atomic  Energy  Commission 

Contract  AT(30-1)  2663 


July,  1963 

This  publication  is  for  technical  information  only  and  does  not 
represent  recommendations  or  conclusions  of  the  sponsoring 
agencies,  Reproduction  of  this  document  in  whole  or  in  part  is 
permitted  for  any  purpose  of  the  U.S.  Government, 

In  citing  this  manuscript  in  a  bibliography,  the  reference  should 
state  that  it  is  unpublished. 


-1- 


In  his  recent  text  (1962)  von  Arx  has  written,  (p.  114)  '‘The  Ekman  spiral 
has  been  observed  in  the  atmosphere  and  has  been  produced  in  the  laboratory  in 
rotating  tanks  and  ocean  models,  but  its  occurrence  in  the  wind -influenced  layer 
of  the  ocean  has  not  been  demonstrated  beyond  the  tendency  for  sea  ice  and  some 
currents  to  move  at  6ome  angle  to  the  right  of  the  wind*"  In  a  number  of  observa* 
tions  using  dye  tracers  we  have  noticed  certain  features  which  seem  to  be  explained 
best  by  the  "Ekman  Effect",  though  the  circulation  pattern  in  the  area  of  these 
experiments  is  so  intricate  that  it  is  doubtful  whether  an  Ekman  spiral  in  the  ideal 
sense  could  be  expected* 

Since  the  summer  of  1961  we  have  performed  a  number  of  experiments  usin 
Rhodamine  dye  on  the  sea  surface  as  a  tracer  to  aid  in  the  study  of  turbulent 
diffusion  and  local  circulation*  The  methods  used  are  those  described  by  Pritchard 
and  Carpenter  (I960)*  We  often  supplement  our  measurements  with  aerial  photo¬ 
graphs,  mainly  to  assist  in  determining  the  actual  shape  of  the  dye  patch,  which  is 
often  fairly  complex* 

Most  of  our  observations  have  been  made  in  the  area  of  the  New  York  Eight* 
Here  the  circulation  in  summer  and  fall  is  dominated  by  weak  counter-clockwise 
eddies  close  to  the  New  Jersey  shore,  which  carry  southward  the  low  salinity 
effluent  of  the  Hudson -Raritan  estuaries*  Outside  this  coastal  band,  about  ten 
miles  off  shore  in  more  saline  water,  there  is  a  northward  moving  current*  Super¬ 
imposed  on  this  pattern  are  weak  tidal  currents  whose  main  vectors  lie  on  a  north¬ 
west  -  southeast  axis,  the  excursion  of  the  ebb  to  the  southeast  being  of  greatest 
magnitude*  This  circulation  pattern  is  rapidly  broken  up  in  the  presence  of  storms* 
The  wave  and  swell  pattern  may  be  very  complex  due  to  reflection  and  refraction 
at  the  shores,  and  refraction  over  the  Hudson  submarine  Canyon* 

Our  discussion  concerns  certain  characteristics  of  surface  dye  patches  in 


i.  '.  V  T  '  (-  1 


V-  j  4 


;  •  .  ,  . .*  '  •  i  it :  ' 


' 


- 


•  . 


i  t  .  •  -  -  -  / 


c  ?.  r! 


rn  •  ;tu  -  r.  •  r.  •  ■ «  -  • 


; 


•:  ’ 


.  *  * 


Dbon  .  vwH  sw  9100*1*  ir\  ;  .  b 


«  • 

(I  jl  *  ■> 


.  -  ?  •  \  :  >  o*f?  :  .  :  rn  r:>L  t>.  j  \d  Sc  < 


*  f,  t  <  •  ■  ;  ;  "  .  ‘  •.  N-' i  :  I  . 

a.  .  ■  ..?•  . 

.  .  .  •'  .  ,  .v  •  •  *  •  •  •  ■  . •  ! '• !  '  '  .  -..i.  .  •  .  •  £♦  =:d" 


_•!  ‘  v. 


,  .  •  r ,  t  •  .  . 


-  V* 


v  •  f  •  •  ....  .  /•  .  .  »  1  .  f-M'  •  }  i>j  r  .  't  *,  j  un: 


d  :  1 !  .  '  •  ’ 


4  •  i ■ 

1  •  .  .  . 

:  ;  r-K  .  !  tdrr.-..  :  -.U,  .  -  "  J 

\  •  •  •  :  ,3101  fdlia  .  '  3r  *-  : 

,  •  •'  .  ,  r-  :  ?  ’  •  i  i  -.-..  •  4-.  9tU 


•  W  ,  i.  .•  .  .•  :  •  *  ‘  ...  ..'••V  sn'fsr.  •  .  r:i  s‘i  -J  ■  Vv  •  tlm 


:  j  •  •  •  '  .  ..  £.•  ,  ,  la..  •  •  •  ; . 


■ 


»  •  . 

•  .  .  .  •  •  ‘  .  *.*Ci  .  . 


'  •  •  '  L: 


-2- 


this  area,  particularly  during  the  early  stages  of  their  spreading*  Figures  1,  3 
and  5  are  aerial  photographs  of  dye  patches  on  different  dates;  all  exhibit  features 
which  appear  to  be  common  during  the  first  few  hours  of  surface  dye  introductions 
in  the  presence  of  steady,  moderate  winds  and  in  the  absence  of  strong  currents  and 
high  seas*  These  characteristics  can  be  listed  as  follows: 

1*  The  patch  will  initially  take  on  a  striated  pattern  which  is 
aligned  with  the  swell  waves. 

2,  The  trailing  (more  tenuous)  portion  of  the  patch  that  most 
strongly  exhibits  the  striated  pattern  lies  at  a  level  below 
the  surface,  while  the  concentrated  leading  portion  lies 

at  the  surface.  This  can  be  clearly  seen  in  Figure  1,  where 
the  research  vessel  (whose  draft  is  nine  feet)  has  stirred 
dye  up  to  the  surface  when  passing  through  the  tail  (center 
of  photograph).  On  the  upper  right  in  this  photograph, 
the  ship1  s  wake  reveals  that  it  has  crossed  the  head  of  the 
dye  and  stirred  clear  water  up  to  the  surface. 

3.  Where  moderate  winds  prevail,  the  dye  patch  takes  a  comet¬ 
like  form  with  a  curved  tail.  In  all  but  one  case  the  curva¬ 
ture  was  counter-clockwise,  i.  e.  as  though  the  leading 
portion  (the  high  concentration  head)  was  turning  to  the  left. 

The  curvature  has  been  observed  in  seven  out  of  ten  experiments,  six  of 
which  were  conducted  in  the  New  York  Bight,  two  south  of  Jamaica  in  the 


Caribbean,  and  two  on  the  Eahama  Banks.  Of  the  three  experiments  which  did  not 


produce  a  curved  pattern,  two  were  in  the  very  shallow  water  on  the  Bahama  Banl 
the  other,  south  of  Jamaica,  consisted  of  a  long  line  of  dye  introduced  fifteen  feet 
below  the  surface  and  running  perpendicular  to  the  direction  of  the  wind,  which 


•  •••-*  -r;-v  .  > 

:  .  -■  ’  ..  .••••  •  • 

>r’  ’  •  ■■  '  1.  •;  . ..  „  i  >  . 


;  • 


■ 


;  ’  .  V  ... 

' 

'  3*  £  .  s  %'/:  l  .  •  , 


-  !  '  . 


* 


f 


i  .  •  c  5.  •; ! 


-  ■'  :i  '■ 


'■  ' 

’■  •  •  '  '  •  .  •  '  '  '  ...  - 

•  .  bt  e  to  ...  5fiJ  a  ... 


■  ) 


o,'.:  aria 

'  ' 

•  '  .  .. 

. 

•  •  '  •  "  '  ••••  ‘  •  .  •  >  .  ; 

' 

■  *  '  •  ■  .■  :  ..  .  .  . 
*  •  r  • 

■  ■ 

‘  •  '  ••  ■  •  '  •  .  ■  . 

■  •  •  . ; 


‘  a  ■  '■ 


. 


■  -  ■ 


-3  — 

was  mild  (about  5-10  knots),  until  the  very  last  stages  when  the  dye  had  already 
become  highly  attenuated. 

Since  we  have  observed  that  in  surface  and  near-surface  experiments  the 
dye  responds  quite  readily  to  changes  in  the  wind,  we  attempted  at  first  to  explain 
the  curvature  on  this  basis.  However,  in  four  cases  where  no  significant  change  in 
wind  direction  was  observed,  the  dye  patch  assumed  a  counter-clockwise  curvature. 
Thus  changes  in  wind  direction  are  not  of  themselves  adequate  explanation  for  the 
observed  curvature. 

If  local  and/or  transient  gyrals  are  the  cause  of  the  curvature,  we  should 
reasonably  expect  that  they  would  have  random  directions  of  rotation,  and  hence 
that  we  should  see  clockwise  and  counter-clockwise  curvatures  with  about  equal 
frequency.  In  fact,  we  have  observed  clockwise  curvature  only  once  in  a  dye 
introduction  at  fifteen  feet  depth  and  there  is  evidence  for  attributing  this  case  to 
the  effects  of  changing  wind  direction,  (The  wind  had  shifted  from  SSE  to  NW), 

The  persistence  of  this  counter-clockwise  curvature  in  the  presence  of  moderate 
winds  which  remain  steady  in  direction  makes  it  unlikely  that  it  can  be  attributed 
to  purely  local  or  transient  phenomena. 

The  shear  between  horizontal  water  layers  evidencedin  photographs,  such 

as  Figure  1,  suggests  that  the  pattern  we  see  could  be  the  result  of  rotary  tidal 

currents  or  of  wind-driven  drift  currents.  Inf  airly  shallow  waters  cum  sole  rotary 

tidal  currents  could  produce  patterns  similar  to  the  ones  we  have  observed,  but  in 

inshore  waters  reflection  from  the  coastline  and  the  effects  of  bottom  irregulari- 
c  an 

ties  combine  with  tidal  forces  to  give  alternating  or  contra  solem  rotary  tidal 
currents.  Added  to  this  the  effluent  of  large  rivers  can  produce  very  distorte  d 
tidal  current  ellipses.  Such  is  the  case  in  the  New  York  Bight,  the  extreme  com¬ 
plexity  of  which  is  indicated  in  the  tidal  current  diagram  Fig,  Z ,  It  seems  unlikely 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2020  with  funding  from 
Columbia  University  Libraries 


https://archive.org/details/noteonsomeobservOOgera 


-4- 


that  such  a  current  pattern  could  account  for  the  observed  shapes  of  our  dye  patches. 
Furthermore,  if  the  dye  pattern  is  due  mainly  to  tidal  currents,  in  an  experiment 
conducted  over  two  or  more  tidal  cycles,  a  periodic  change  of  shape  is  expectable. 
No  such  periodicity  has  been  observed.  There  remains  to  be  considered  pure 
wind  effects.  The  ready  response  of  the  dye  to  wind  changes,  the  general  resem¬ 
blance  of  the  patterns  to  the  upper  portions  of  an  Ekman  spiral,  and  the  fact  that 
fewer  difficulties  arise  from  attributing  the  curvature  to  the  combination  of  wind 
stress  and  Coriolis  force  than  any  of  the  other  possibilities  considered  make  us 
favor  this  explanation. 

Projected  on  a  horizontal  plane,  a  wind-driven  current  will  show  a 
decrease  in  velocity  and  change  of  direction  at  regular  intervals  of  depth  down  to 
a  depth  D,  the  upper  frictional  depth.  The  classical  relationship  is: 

D  =  7.61  w  si n<j>  meters,  where  w  =  wind  velocity  and  (p  =  latitude,  but  most 
investigators  take  it  to  be  about  100  meters  in  mid-latitudes  and  for  moderate 
winds  (Ekman,  1928;  Proudman,  1953).  Figures  3  and  5  are  photographs  of 
experiments  conducted  in  different  areas  within  the  New  York  Bight.  The  photo¬ 
graphs  were  taken  about  one  and  one -half  and  two  hours  respectively  after  the  dye 
was  introduced. 

At  the  time  of  these  experiments  the  seasonal  thermocline  had  disappeared, 
and  temperatures  were  nearly  uniform  to  the  bottom.  The  depth  in  the  areas  of 
these  experiments  was  considerably  less  than  100  meters,  and  the  effects  of  the 
bottom  friction  have  been  taken  into  consideration  in  the  manner  of  Defant  (1961) 
in  determining  the  configuration  of  the  expected  distribution.  To  obtain  the 
expected  configuration,  we  have  assumed  an  established  drift  current  having 


velocity  at  the  surface  given  by  Proudman  (1952: 

Tpk  r* 


us  = 


u 


y/Z  D  Y* 


-*•  ’>y  *  ;  1  •  •  -  .  •  •  ,  •  .f.t 


:  -  */  J  , '  : 

■ 

^  ‘  •  '  ...  .  ‘  w.  -  1  Vj 


•  ..  .  u: 
j  VI  Jr:  n 


where: 


-5- 


=  I  I _  ,  the  half  pendulum  day 

w  sin  0 

=  2.5  x  10~3 

=  density  of  air,  taken  as  1.25  x  10"^  gm/cm^ 

=  density  of  sea  water,  taken  as  1.03  gm/cm^ 
a  thickness  of  the  upper  frictional  layer,  taken  as  100  meters 
=  the  wind  speed. 

Using  this  formula,  we  have  plotted  the  position  of  a  "disk”  of  dye  on  the  surface 
two  hours  after  dye  injection.  From  a  graphical  description  by  Defant  giving  the 
vertical  structure  in  drift  current  for  water  depths  less  than  D,  we  have  been  able 
to  plot  the  relative  positions  of  several  other  '’disks"  at  discrete  levels  down  to 
forty  feet,  the  limit  of  visibility.  The  size  of  these  "disks"  was  estimated  on  the 
basis  of  a  "most  probable  diffusion  velocity  of  1  cm/  sec,  which  is  approximately 
the  value  yielded  by  our  experiments.  Distortion  due  to  the  fact  that  the  dye  does 
not  instantly  reach  a  depth  of  forty  feet  is  believed  to  be  minimal,  since  vertical 
diffusion  was  quite  rapid  due  to  the  homogeneity  of  the  water.  In  plotting  the 
observed  configuration,  the  drift  due  to  tidal  motions  has  been  estimated  from  tide 
tables  and  tidal  current  charts,  and  this  has  been  subtracted  from  the  actual  dis¬ 
placement  of  the  dye  from  the  pcsition  at  which  it  was  dumped.  Shear  between 
horizontal  layers  due  to  tidal  movements,  the  river  effluent,  and  the  intricate 
pattern  of  the  coastline  could  also  be  expected  to  contribute  their  effects.  However; 
since  we  have  insufficient  data,  these  influences  have  not  been  taken  into  account. 

The  experiment  on  October  17  (Figures  3  and  4)  was  made  about  eight 
miles  east  of  Sandy  Hook  in  water  of  27  meters  depth.  The  wind  was  fairly  steady 
for  several  hours  at  about  16  knots  from  the  west.  The  observed  displacenment 
of  the  dye  patch  was  to  the  left,  rather  than  to  the  right  of  the  wind.  Since  only  tidal 


k 

r* 

r 

D 

Ua 


■ 

' 

. 

. 


•  : 


Miv  .itt 


Oct.  17,  IS 61 

At  Ambrose  Lightship 
2  hours  after  dump 
27. meters  deep 


DUMP 

O 


0.2  mi 


-6- 

drift  was  taken  into  account  in  the  figure,  these  seemingly  contradictory  results  couli 
readily  be  accounted  for  by  a  net  north  current  of  0,2  knots.  The  counter-clockwise 
curvature  is  still  present,  but  greatly  distorted  by  other  forces. 

On  October  31  at  a  location  about  nineteen  miles  southeast  of  Sandy  Hook, 
two  experiments  were  performed  in  water  of  61  meters  depth.  In  the  first,  a 
barrel  of  dye  was  introduced  at  0300  hours,  when  the  wind  was  7  knots  from  the 
we st- southwest.  At  0900  hours  the  wind  remained  unchanged,  and  at  0800  hours 
the  dye  had  roughly  assumed  the  shape  of  a  broad  ellipse  with  many  finger-like 
projections  perpendicular  to  the  long  axis  on  both  sides.  This  shape  was  main¬ 
tained  until  about  10:30,  at  which  time  the  second  experiment  was  begun.  The 
second  dye  patch  immediately  began  to  assume  a  comet-like  shape  with  tenuous 
tails  and  counter-clockwise  curvature,  A  wind  reading  taken  at  this  time  showed 
that  the  velocity  had  increased  to  12  knots,  still  from  the  west.  Figures  5  and  6 
show  the  pattern  of  the  second  experiment  about  two  hours  after  the  introduction. 

At  this  time  the  plane  returned  to  the  site  of  the  first  dye  patch  to  find  that  it,  too, 

■s  «»•  1 

was  beginning  to  assume  a  shape  with  an  unmistakable  counter-clockwise  curvature. 

A  number  of  photographs  were  taken  showing  this,  but  the  dye  had  become  so 
attenuated  that  good  reproductions  of  the  photographs  cannot  be  made.  The  photo¬ 
graphs  show  that,  in  both  cases,  the  orientation  of  the  curved  dye  patch  with 
respect  to  the  wind  was  the  same  and  about  what  would  be  expected  for  a  pure  drift 
current. 

In  later  stages  of  dye  patches  we  have  observed  that,  when  the  direction 
of  the  wind  is  steady,  the  curvature  usually  tends  to  disappear.  We  believe  that 
this  is  due  to  the  fact  that  as  the  dye  becomes  more  attenuated,  the  depth  to  which 
it  can  be  seen  decreases.  Thus,  although  the  overall  dimensions  of  the  pattern 
increase  with  time,  we  observe  an  increasingly  smaller  portion  of  an  increasingly 


. 

* 

t  •• 


FIGUr 


Inlet 


Fig.  8 

Oct.  31,196! 

10  mi.  east  of 


Shark 
d  u  m  c 

i 

ep 


\ 


U.i  mi. 


K- 


-7- 

larger  spiral. 

Probably  the  best  evidence  in  support  of  the  notion  that  the  observed 
curvature  is  the  result  of  the  Ekman  effect  is  its  persistence  in  a  wide  variety  of 
circumstances.  It  would,  therefore,  be  interesting  to  see  the  results  of  a  similar 
experiment  conducted  in  the  southern  hemisphere,  where  the  curvature  should  be 
clockwise. 

It  is  also  of  interest  to  consider  a  dye  experiment  designed  to  test  the 
wind  current.  For  quantitative  work,  an  area  of  simple  circulation  and  greater 
depth  would  have  to  be  chosen.  A  useful  method  might  be  the  simultaneous  ejection 
of  filaments  or  pulses  of  dyd  at  regular  depth  intervals  in  a  clear  deep-water  area. 


The  resulting  pattern  could  be  photographed  from  the  air  under  various  wind  condi¬ 
tions,  Several  such  experiments  are  underway  at  the  present  time. 


■ 

. 


OjO 


*  CW  -  Clockwise 
**  CCW  -  Counter-clockwise 


! 


14:06  135 


(cont'd)  4 


» 


IV 


f 


I 


i 


& 


i 


) 

! 


<i 


References 


Ekman,  V.  W.  ;  A  Survey  of  Some  Theoretical  Investigations  on  Ocean-Currents, 
J.  du  Conseil,  Vol.  III,  No.  3,  December,  1928. 


Pritchard,  D.  W.  and  J.  H.  Carpenter,  Measurements  of  Turbulent  Diffusion  in 
Estuaries  and  Inshore  Waters:  Bull.  Int.  Assoc.  Sci.  Hydrol., 

No.  20,  37,  I960. 


Proudman,  J.;  Dynamical  Oceanography,  J.  Wiley  &  Sons,  New  York,  1953. 


Defant,  A,;  Physical  Oceanography,  Pergamon  Press,  New  York,  Vol.  I,  1961. 


Leaf,  W.  B.;  ’’Tracing  Water  Movement,"  Undersea  Technology,  pp.  24-26, 
March,  1963. 


von  Arx,  W.  S.;  An  Introduction  to  Physical  Oceanography,  Addison-Wesley, 

Reading,  Mass.,  1962. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 


The  work  reported  in  this  paper  was  supported  by  the  Atomic 
Energy  Commission  of  the  U.S.  Government  under  Contract  AT(30-1)2663. 


i 


- 


► 


,  T 


’ 


1 


*  . 


1 


COLUMBIA  LIBRARIES  OFFSITE